Drawing for CEWIN

USPTO serial 79018285

CEWIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3174354Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2006
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEWIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CECELIA M. PERRY

CECELIA M PERRY SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW & TUTTLE PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for automation technology, namely, industrial robots for use in manufacturing, handling, manipulating and assembly purposes and parts thereof; operating panels for the aforesaid goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electrical controllers as parts of machines and robots; data processors; computers; computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; computer software for use in the parallel deployment of more than one operating system, in deploying parallel applications and in performing parallel computations; computer software for real time extension to windows operating systems; blank magnetic data carriers; electronic controls for industrial robots, for use in the manufacturing industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer software design and development for others, for linking robot software to applications and manufacturing software; computer programming for others; updating of computer software for others; rental of computers and software; maintenance of computer software; computer consultationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 9, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 6, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 25, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance