Drawing for MONTEFALCO SAGRANTINO

USPTO serial 79018355

MONTEFALCO SAGRANTINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3247719Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2007
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 131

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MONTEFALCO SAGRANTINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

Karen Lim Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd St., 17th Fl.New York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 22, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 26, 2019CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Oct 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 23, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 19, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 11, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 5, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Dec 5, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 8, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 8, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 29, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 24, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 23, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 19, 2007ISSRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 2, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance