Drawing for DR. RIMPLER

USPTO serial 79018357

DR. RIMPLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. RIMPLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery, essential oils, cosmeticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
005Pharmaceutical preparations, as well as preparations for hygieneSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 9, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 24, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 19, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 22, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance