Drawing for PLANNINGIT

USPTO serial 79018392

PLANNINGIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANNINGIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment and computers ("planningIT" technology)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Business management; business administration; consultancy (business consultancy based on "planningIT" technology)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Computer programming in the field of "planningIT" technologySECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 5, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 24, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance