Drawing for SIGNALCHIP

USPTO serial 79018393

SIGNALCHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIGNALCHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry and science, namely reagents for visualizing binding reactions on nucleotide, peptide or protein arrays; including the aforesaid goods in the form of kitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Single-use laboratory articles for analysing nucleic acids, peptides or proteins, namely nucleotide, peptide or protein arraysSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 29, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance