Drawing for TRUMY

USPTO serial 79018411

TRUMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007shaft couplings for machines; transmission shafts other than for land vehicles; power jacks; wheels being parts of machines; universal cardan jointsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 20, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 23, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 24, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance