USPTO serial 79018484
MITH@ ISTANBUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3225281Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MITH@ ISTANBUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Sisli ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Sisli ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Sisli ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony D. Logan
ANTHONY D LOGAN VENABLE, CAMPILLO, LOGAN & MEANEY PC1938 E OSBORN RDPHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, dress suits, pullovers, jackets, coats, sweat-shirts, sweaters, tee-shirts, trousers, undershirts, cardigans, body suits, socks, skirts, dresses, gloves, shawl, ties, foulards, shoes, shorts, bustiers; parkas, berets, clothing of leather, namely; leather jackets, leather coats, leather topcoats, leather pants, leather shoes, leather waistcoats, leather ties, leather skirts, leather gloves; clothing for sports, namely; sport coats, sport shirts, sport tee-shirts, sports jackets, sport sweat-suits, sports shoes, sports socks; sport topcoats; sport trousers; sport belts; clothing combinations, namely, caps, head bands, hoods; suits; braces, neckties, slippers, sandals, hats; footwear; headwear | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by MITHAT GIYIM SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MITH@ ISTANBUL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |