Drawing for STAR PLUS

USPTO serial 79018520

STAR PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAR PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, distributing, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling of electricity; apparatus for recording, transmitting or reproduction of sounds or images; magnetic data carriers, data processing equipment and computers, satellite receivers, digital satellite receivers; satellite aerials; LNB-convertersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Air conditioning apparatus and parts of air conditioning installations (included in this class); air conditioning installationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038TelecommunicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 18, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance