USPTO serial 79018551
LUMIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3335348Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUMIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. Baber
Bruce W. Baber King & Spalding LLP1180 Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamps and other lighting installations and ornaments, namely, incandescent lamps, fluorescent lamps, discharge lamps; tungsten-halogen lamps; * and electronic lighting systems comprising ballasts for fluorescent lamps; * electric lighting fixtures | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Havells Sylvania Fixtures Netherlands B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LUMIANCE B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LUMIANCE B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by LUMIANCE B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Flowil International Lighting (Holding) B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named LUMIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | INAR | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |