Drawing for KU KU MA LU

USPTO serial 79018571

KU KU MA LU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223263Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KU KU MA LU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stationery; electric or non-electric pencil sharpeners; writing cases for stationery; writing instruments; color pens; drawing rulers, note books; glues for stationery or household purposes; paper knives; non-electric stapling presses; pencil casesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
018School bags; backpacks; handbags; valises, traveling luggage trunks; briefcases, attaché cases; purses, wallets, umbrellas; textile bags for shopping; leather key casesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Aug 7, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 1, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 1, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 25, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 31, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 22, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance