Drawing for E-TRAKKA

USPTO serial 79018598

E-TRAKKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3245080Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2007
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-TRAKKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK

JENNIFER A VAN KIRK LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, heart rate monitors to be worn during exercise, medical electrodes and biofeedback sensors; equipment for measuring and monitoring the fitness of animals, namely, fitness measuring and monitoring equipment for horses comprising a heart rate monitor, global positioning system (GPS) based velocity meter, electrodes, antennae, data processing unit, radio modulator and display panelSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2016UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED
Jun 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 22, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 31, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Oct 31, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 31, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 22, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Oct 22, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 30, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 8, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 8, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance