USPTO serial 79018603
WISEGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3239999Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WISEGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LES CLAYES SOUS BOIS, FR
LES CLAYES SOUS BOIS, FR
FR
LES CLAYES SOUS BOIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Tally Eitan
A. Tally Eitan Eitan, Mehulal & Sadot18106 Kitchen House Courtc/o Edna EisemannGERMANTOWN, MD 20874Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, for managing and controlling access to computers, in the field of computer security | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Updating, upgrading and maintenance services for others for computer software in the field user access management and control; technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in the field of user access management and control; Technical consulting services for others in the field of computer security and computer user access management and control; Computer programming and computer program development for others in the fields of computer security and particularly access management and control | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVIDIAN
- Other trademarks owned by EVIDIAN
- Other trademarks owned by ENATEL
- Other trademarks owned by EVIDIAN
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WISEGUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 7, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |