Drawing for X'PERT-ÉPIL

USPTO serial 79018604

X'PERT-ÉPIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223264Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X'PERT-ÉPIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Johns

Michael D. Johns The Procter & Gamble Company299 E Sixth StreetS8-215Cincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Electrical and non-electrical hair removal appliances for personal use as well as proper attachment caps, protective caps, function caps and shear heads; parts for the aforementioned appliancesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 3, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 3, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 1, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 26, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 24, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 14, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 24, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance