USPTO serial 79018623
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Patch
Andrew J. Patch YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON ST., SUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Soaps; perfumery, essential oils, ] cosmetics [, hair lotions; dentifrices ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 10, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |