Drawing for GOMON

USPTO serial 79018662

GOMON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3294184Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 18, 2007
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOMON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Hot water heaters; electric cooking utensils, namely, cooking ovens; gas burners for domestic use; hot plates; solar furnaces; marsh gas cookers; microwave ovens; refrigerators; gas water heaters; electric hot water heaters; solar powered hot water heaters; hot water bottles; range hoods for kitchens; solar collectors; heat exchangers not parts of machines; sterilizers; water fountains; electric pressure cookers; electric slow cookers; thermal vacuum heat accumulators; glass vacuum heat accumulators; solar heat pumps; air conditioning apparatus; gas and electric stovesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 19, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 19, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 23, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 23, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 25, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 25, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 18, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 13, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 31, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 31, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 1, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance