Drawing for ECOSTACKER

USPTO serial 79018684

ECOSTACKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3218230Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 13, 2007
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOSTACKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Michal

ROBERT P MICHAL FRISHAUF, HOLTZ, GOODMAN & CHICK PC220 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10001-7708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal covers for metal and non-metal packaging containers and tins and replacement parts therefore; metal packages containers and tins, namely preserve tins for industrial and consumer productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Non-metal covers for metal and non-metal packaging containers and tins and replacement parts therefore; plastic packaging containers for industrial and consumer productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
021Containers for household or kitchen use, not of precious metal; pot lidsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
029Meat, fish, poultry, game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies being bread spreads, jams, compotes, eggs, milk; milk products, namely powdered milk products for food purposes, whipped cream, coffee creamer, evaporated milk, cheese, yogurt, cream cheese; edible oils and fatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes, flour, [ready to eat, cereal derived] *ready-to-eat cereal-derived* food bars, bread, pastries, pastries with confectionery preparations, flavored ices, honey, treacle, yeast, baking-powder, salt, mustard, condiments, namely ketchup, mayonnaise, spices, ice; milk based products namely dessert puddingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 17, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 18, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 18, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Dec 3, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Sep 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 24, 2007COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Sep 11, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Sep 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Aug 9, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 19, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance