Drawing for SILKY

USPTO serial 79018743

SILKY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3220292Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILKY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

Thomas J. Moore BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 Slaters Lane, Fourth FloorAlexandria, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools, namely, hand operated saws; sickles [ and knives ] and accessories therefor, namely, sheaths for saws [ and knives, ] replacement blades and handles and gripsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 20, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 24, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 6, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 6, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Feb 23, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 20, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 8, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 14, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 14, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 14, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 5, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance