USPTO serial 79018805
SHORTCLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3204184Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2007
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHORTCLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARL OPPEDAHL
Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLCP O Box 5940Dillon, CO 80435-5940UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Siamese (symmetrical) pipe connections based on the plug-in principle used for instantly and hermetically connecting pipes to machines and other apparatus, made of metal or metal combined with plastic | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Siamese (symmetrical) pipe connections based on the plug-in principle used for instantly and hermetically connecting pipes to machines and other apparatus, made of plastic, rubber or plastic combined with metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dipl.Ing. HENN Ges.m.b.H. & Co.KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dipl.Ing. HENN Ges.m.b.H. & Co.KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dipl.Ing. HENN Ges.m.b.H. & Co.KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named SHORTCLIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |