Drawing for PINK PLUS

USPTO serial 79018809

PINK PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PINK PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications, wireless transmission services for radio and television programmes (broadcasting), wire transmission services for radio and television programmes (cable broadcasting), transmission services for radio and television programmes by satellite, data transmission servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 23, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 11, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 31, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Dec 11, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance