CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for KALE

USPTO serial 79018830

KALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288291Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Jay Hines

P. Jay Hines Cantor Colburn LLP1800 Diagonal RoadSuite 510Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Toilets, toilet seats, squat-style toilets made of stoneSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Floor tiles, not of metal, ceramic tiles, faience tiles for buildingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Soap holder, boxes of metals for dispensing paper towels, toilet brush, toilet paper holder, sponge holderSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 6, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 11, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance