CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NOOSE

USPTO serial 79018834

NOOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256586Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIE ANNE MASTROVITO

MARIE ANNE MASTROVITO ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and devices for use in the field of intruder detection and alarm signaling systems, namely, CCTV digital audio and video recorders, CCTV multiplex recorders, digital video compression and decompression devices, CCTV digital video cameras, remote control units for CCTV digital cameras, CCTV video monitors, digital audio and video transmitters, receivers and transceivers, computer software for operating CCTV security systems, computer software for remote accessing and viewing of CCTV audio and video signals and recordings, computer hardware and software for recording, processing, transmitting and storing CCTV signals and dataSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 28, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 8, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 31, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 3, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance