Drawing for REDSTONE VALLEY

USPTO serial 79018840

REDSTONE VALLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDSTONE VALLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIA C.H. LIN

MARIA C H LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely wines and sparkling winesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 9, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 26, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance