Drawing for BIO ONE

USPTO serial 79018888

BIO ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIO ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Flours made with organically-farmed cereals, organically-farmed cereal preparations, bread and pastries made with such flours and preparationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 19, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 20, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 12, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance