USPTO serial 79018926
SOARO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3395036Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2008
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOARO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
19-4 Gangnam-gu; Seoul, KR
19-4 Gangnam-gu; Seoul, KR
MX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Fresh ground rice meal containing soya and perilla flour; dried powder of rice flour, soya flour, and perilla flour; rice flour containing soya and perilla | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |