USPTO serial 79019044
FLIRTSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3272532Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLIRTSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-7111 Parndorf, AT
A-7111 Parndorf, AT
A-7111 Parndorf, AT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Personal and social services rendered by others to meet the needs of individuals, namely personal letter writing and personal lifestyle consulting services; match-making services; computer dating services; provision of dating agency services via the internet; provision of dating agency services via television, radio and telephone; social escorting services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |