Drawing for EENI MEENI MIINI MOH

USPTO serial 79019104

EENI MEENI MIINI MOH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EENI MEENI MIINI MOH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, creams, bubble bath, moisturisersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
020Furniture, chairs, high chairs, seats, cushions, tables, beds, cots, storage boxes, storage shelves, coat hangersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
024Textiles, bed linen, towelsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, footwear, headgear, hatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 21, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 2, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 21, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance