Drawing for LAINO

USPTO serial 79019307

LAINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3230041Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2007
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LAINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger STUDEBAKER BRACKETT PLLC8255 Greensboro DriveSuite 300Tysons, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, varnish removers; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; ] soaps, namely, skin soaps, shampoo, shower gels and washing creams; perfumery; [ essential oils; ] cosmetics, namely, hand creams, lip stick, make-up removers, beauty masks, face lotions, cleansing milk for the body and face, body oil, and purifying gels for the face [ hair lotions; and dentifrices ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 3, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 23, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 23, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 15, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 15, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 15, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 28, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 13, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 25, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 3, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 3, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 3, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
May 3, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 2, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 16, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 20, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 19, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance