Drawing for DONGSEN EAST FOREST

USPTO serial 79019350

DONGSEN EAST FOREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DONGSEN EAST FOREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric lamps; ultraviolet ray lamps, not for medical purposes; arc lamps; Lighters primarily for lighting grills, fireplaces and candlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Apr 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 28, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Oct 20, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance