Drawing for KONE DECO

USPTO serial 79019396

KONE DECO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3245088Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2007
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KONE DECO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attention: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007lifting and transporting equipment, namely, elevators, escalators, and moving walkways and parts and fittings for said goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Electronic equipment for advertising, namely, electric and luminous signs for advertisingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Providing advertising displays and spaces for othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 12, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 19, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 11, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance