USPTO serial 79019419
CHRONOGRAPHE SUISSE CIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3245090Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2007
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHRONOGRAPHE SUISSE CIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
MAÎTRE JACQUES MOUTOT19, RUE AMPèREF PARIS, 75017FRANCEGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and alloys thereof, other than for dental use; jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments of all kinds and their parts, jewelry cases and caskets of precious metal, watch and timepiece cases for protection; all of the foregoing being manufactured in Switzerland | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |