USPTO serial 79019421
BABISHLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3169000Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- GAN, REBECCAH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABISHLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. EGBERT
JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, overcoats, coats, raincoats, jackets, trousers, skirts, dresses, suits, waistcoats, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pullovers, skirts, sweaters, overalls, underwear, undershirts, underpants, panties, jeans; clothing made of combed cotton, tricot, denim, leather or paper, namely, overcoats, coats, raincoats, jackets, trousers, skirts, dresses, suits, waistcoats, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pullovers, skirts, sweaters, overalls, underwear, undershirts; sports clothing, namely, gym shorts, jogging pants, jogging suits, sports shirts; bath robes, bathing suits, beach clothes, namely, beach coverups and beach footwear, underwear, gloves, socks; footwear, including rubber boots, boots, slippers, baby shoes, sports shoes and spikes therefor; parts for footwear, namely soles, heels, footwear uppers and uppers for boots; headgear, namely, hats, berets, caps and caps with peaks; clothing for babies, namely, infant and toddler one piece clothing, infant and baby sleepers, infants' trousers, infants' shoes and boots, baby dresses, baby underwear, baby skirts, baby sweaters, baby shirts, baby pyjamas, baby coats, baby slippers, baby jackets, baby sweaters, baby socks, swaddling clothes of textile for babies, diapers and cloth diapers for babies; ties, bow ties, shawls, scarves, pareos, collars, bandanas, muffs, headbands, belts, suspenders, garters belts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ÇILGIN BEBE TEKSTIL GIDA TURIZM INSAAT PAZARLAMA SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by ÇILGIN BEBE TEKSTIL GIDA TURIZM INSAAT PAZARLAMA SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by ÇILGIN BEBE TEKSTIL GIDA TURIZM INSAAT PAZARLAMA SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BABISHLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 12, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |