Drawing for COLOR FUSION

USPTO serial 79019436

COLOR FUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR FUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna W. Manville, Roberta Horton, Melissa Cross, Johm Sheesley and Ellen Woodward

ANNA W MANVILLE, ROBERTA HORTON, MELISS IP DOCKETINGARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Natural and synthetic precious gemstones, decoration gemstones, in particular gemstones made of glass, genuine and imitation jewellery, jewellery ornaments, small jewellery objects of glass, plastic or base metal for personal useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 4, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 8, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 8, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 16, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance