USPTO serial 79019475
LOGLIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3253892Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2007
- Examiner
- SAPP, HEATHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOGLIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cargotec Patenter Handelsbolag
SE-341 81 Ljungby, SE
SE
Cargotec Patenter Handelsbolag
SE-341 81 Ljungby, SE
Cargotec Patenter Handelsbolag
SE-341 81 Ljungby, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROY S. GORDET
ROY S GORDET LAW OFFICE OF ROY S GORDET98 BATTERY ST STE 601SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for load handling and cranes; motors and engines for loading and lifting cranes; machine belts and couplings for loading and lifting cranes; loading and lifting cranes, hydraulic loaders; loaders for harvesters; replacement and structural parts therefore | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Motor vehicles incorporating lifting apparatus and cranes, namely, trucks and tractors with mounted winches, hoists and cranes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance of machines, machine tools, motors and engines, machine belts and couplings, loading and lifting cranes, hydraulic loaders, lifting machines and apparatus, hauling engines and apparatus, transmission components, loaders for harvesters, motor vehicles, vehicles incorporating lifting apparatus and cranes, fork-lift trucks, replaceable vehicle platforms, vehicle chassis and traction vehicles; installation services for all the aforesaid goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cargotec Patenter Handelsbolag
- Other trademarks owned by Cargotec Patenter AB
- Other trademarks owned by Cargotec Patenter Handelsbolag
- Other trademarks owned by Cargotec Patenter Handelsbolag
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named LOGLIFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |