Drawing for NEDAP VELOS

USPTO serial 79019493

NEDAP VELOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3335354Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 13, 2007
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEDAP VELOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith W. Medansky, Mark I. Feldman, James P. Ryther, Monica L. Thompson, Christina L. Martini, Linda Urbanik Johnson, Thomas W. Ryan, Micah R. Onixt, Gina L. Durham, Jennifer J. Ruttenberg and Amy C. Ziegler

KEITH W MEDANSKY DLA PIPER US LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automation and management systems in the field of agriculture comprising hardware, namely, personal computers, embedded computers, monitors, displays, integrated displays with keyboards and integrators, transponders, activity meters, transmitters and receivers for the electronic communication between electronic identification apparatus for livestock and electronic components of a livestock management system and between such components, antennae, cameras, sensors, feed stations, and switching feeds, electronic identification apparatus for livestock and livestock management, and operating software for the same all sold as a unit.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Consultancy services related to use and application of integrated automation systems in the field of agriculture, including cattle management.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 17, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 26, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Feb 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 20, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 27, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 13, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 20, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 3, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 31, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance