USPTO serial 79019547
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors, Alcoholic beverages of fruit, Alcoholic fruit extracts, Alcoholic malt coolers, Alcoholic punch, Cachaca, Cognac, Distilled Spirits, Fruit wine, Gin, Hard cider, Natural sparkling wines, Prepared alcoholic cocktail, Prepared wine cocktails, Rum, Sparkling fruit wine, Sparkling grape wine, Sparkling wine, Tequila, Vodka, Whiskey, Wine coolers, Wines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |