Drawing for LES ALGUES GASTRONOMES

USPTO serial 79019553

LES ALGUES GASTRONOMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3220303Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LES ALGUES GASTRONOMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk products containing seaweed or flavoured with seaweed, namely, milk, butter milk, cream, cheese, butter, and yogurtSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Processed cereals containing seaweed or flavoured with seaweed; bread and pastries containing seaweed or flavoured with seaweed; confectionery, namely, candy, chocolates, chewing gum, cookies, crackers, and cakes containing seaweed or flavoured with seaweed; ices containing seaweed or flavoured with seaweed; mustard, vinegar, sauces and dressings for salads containing seaweed or flavoured with seaweedSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
031Fresh, preserved, dried and cooked seaweed; animal foodstuffs containing seaweed or flavoured with seaweedSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 15, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 17, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 25, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 25, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance