Drawing for XV

USPTO serial 79019561

XV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motorcycle helmets; protective clothing; protective headgear; protective gloves; articles of protective clothing for use in motorcycling for protection against accident or injuryACTIVE
018Leather; luggage; travel bags; bags; umbrellas; parasols; rucksacks; purses; walletsACTIVE
021Cups; mugs; glasswareACTIVE
025Clothing, footwear, headgear, hats, caps, wet suits, clothing for protection against water, cold and wet weather, glovesACTIVE
041Entertainment; entertainment services; arranging entertainment in connection with red letter days and activity days and corporate events; arrangement of sporting events, sporting activities, motoring activities, motorcycling activities and extreme sports and extreme activities; motoring activities; hire of equipment for sports and entertainmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance