USPTO serial 79019564
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bickenbach, DE
Bickenbach, DE
DE
DE
Alnatura Produktions-.und Handels GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Alnatura Produktions-.und Handels GmbH
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic products, namely, foods adapted for medical use for children and sick people; tea-like products for health care, namely, herbal teas for medicinal purposes; all of the above-named products being made without using chemical pesticides, fertilizer or preservatives, and if made in whole or in part from animals, such animals were raised via natural grazing and animal rearing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry; game; preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; jam; eggs, milk, yoghurt; butter; cheese, edible oil and fat; preserved food, namely, meat and fish; all the above-named products being made without using chemical pesticides, fertilizer or preservatives, and if made in whole or in part from animals, such animals were raised via natural grazing and animal rearing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, coffee-substitutes, flour, corn-preparations not including animal foods, namely, corn flakes, corn starch, corn starch based drink in the nature of a food beverage consisting primarily of maize and porridge; bread, biscuits, cake, fine pastries; honey, molasses; yeast, baking powder, edible salt, mustard; pepper, vinegar, sauces except for salad dressing, spices, sweet and salty biscuits; salad dressing; the above-named products being made without using chemical pesticides, fertilizer or preservatives and if made in whole or in part from animals, such animals were raised via natural grazing and animal rearing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Fresh fruit and vegetables; malt for brewing and distilling; the above-named products being made without using chemical pesticides, fertilizer or preservatives | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Natural mineral water, spring and bottled mineral water; alcohol-free drinks, namely, fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit beverages containing fruit juice, vegetable juices; syrups for preparing fruit drinks; the above-named products being made without using chemical pesticides, fertilizer or preservatives, and if made in whole or in part from animals, such animals were raised via natural grazing and animal rearing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Liquors made without using chemical pesticides, fertilizer or preservatives and if made in part from animals or their milk, such animals were raised via natural grazing and animal rearing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 5, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |