Drawing for TONII & DAF

USPTO serial 79019574

TONII & DAF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TONII & DAF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

REBECCA L. URYGA

REBECCA L URYGA BURNS & CRAIN LTD300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606-6771UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, lingerie, swim wear and men's underwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising services; providing retail store and wholesale services featuring clothing, footwear and head wearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 20, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 27, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 24, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance