USPTO serial 79019596
OLIVER GOLDSMITH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3225289Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLIVER GOLDSMITH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLIVER GOLDSMITH SUNGLASSES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OLIVER GOLDSMITH SUNGLASSES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OLIVER GOLDSMITH TRADEMARK LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named OLIVER GOLDSMITH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |