USPTO serial 79019641
RIBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES, NAMELY, HYDRAULIC PRESSES, ROLLING MACHINES, FLANGING MACHINES, DISHED HEAD FLANGERS, MACHINES FOR PROFILE BENDING, MACHINES FOR PLATE BENDING, BEADING MACHINES, EDGE MILLING MACHINES, SHEET-STRAIGHTENING MACHINES, SECTION-BENDING MACHINES FOR PROFILE AND TUBE BENDING, BENDING MACHINES FOR ARCH SUPPORT, MACHINES FOR SHIP PROFILE BENDING, ALL IN THE CHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL INDUSTRIES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2006 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |