Drawing for VIA CASTELLO

USPTO serial 79019655

VIA CASTELLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STERKIN, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIA CASTELLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

AIMEE L KAPLAN & STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Paving blocks (concrete), paving and garden paving slabs, kerbstones, step modules and step blocks, bricks and moulded bricks (concrete)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 9, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 2, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance