Drawing for CONECTEM

USPTO serial 79019677

CONECTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONECTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunications and communications services, including communications via computer terminals and digital communications and via global computer networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and technological services, and research and design services related thereto; industrial analysis and research services; computer and software design and developmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 17, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance