Drawing for JIN JING

USPTO serial 79019711

JIN JING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3199095Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 16, 2007
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JIN JING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William R. Samuels

William R. Samuels Scarinci Hollenbeck3 Park AveFloor 15New York, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Silicon iron; Metal alloys of common metal for use in industry; Alloys of common metal for use in industry, namely, ferro alloy, silicon ferro alloy , silicon aluminum alloy, silicon calcium barium alloy, and silicon calcium barium aluminum alloySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 19, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 24, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Apr 18, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 26, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 18, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 17, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 16, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 24, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 23, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 29, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance