Drawing for FORCEROBOT

USPTO serial 79019735

FORCEROBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3312738Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 16, 2007
Examiner
MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORCEROBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dax Alvarez

NAMBITION GMBH TATZBERG 47DRESDEN FED REP, 01307GERMAN DEMOCRATIC

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Laboratory equipment, namely, spectroscopes, microscopes, atomic force microscopes, scanning force microscopes, and atomic force spectroscopes; computer hardware and software for laboratory research in the fields of semiconductor technology, nanotechnology, biotechnology, nanoanalytics, and roboticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 12, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 23, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 23, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 13, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 23, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance