USPTO serial 79019773
BASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Microprocessors, signal processors and microcontrollers; semiconductors; semi-conductor components, such as transistors, diodes, memories, sensors, integrated circuits, wafers; parts of all the aforesaid goods, including housings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of semi-conductor components, microprocessors, signal processors, microcontrollers, electric and electronic circuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2008 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |