USPTO serial 79019801
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ION BEAM APPLICATIONS S.A. en abrégé IBA
BE
Other trademarks owned by ION BEAM APPLICATIONS S.A. en abrégé IBA
ION BEAM APPLICATIONS S.A. en abrégé IBA
BE
Other trademarks owned by ION BEAM APPLICATIONS S.A. en abrégé IBA
Ion Beam Applications, en abrégé IBA
BE
Other trademarks owned by Ion Beam Applications, en abrégé IBA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Denys
Todd A. Denys Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C.600 Alexander Road, Suite 2-1Princeton, NJ 08540UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments for industrial use and for use in research, namely, particle accelerators for sterilization, ionization and treatment of materials, transmutation, dosimetry and measurement, [ energy production, ] radioisotope production, research in particle physics, detection of explosives and contraband products; computer software for management of particle accelerators for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Apparatus and instruments for medical use or integrated in medical applications, namely, particle accelerators for medical use, equipment for proton beam therapy [ and radiation therapy, apparatus and equipment for brachytherapy, ] instruments for medical use for dosimetry, equipment for radioisotope production for medical use, [ radioisotopes for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer; nuclear medicine diagnostic imaging apparatus, ] electromagnetic medical diagnostic imaging apparatus for use in the field of oncology [, radioactive surgical implants comprising artificial material ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and development of particle accelerators [ and nuclear medicine treatments ]; technological consultation in the field of particle accelerators for industrial use and medical use; design of particle accelerators; industrial analysis and research services in the field of particle accelerators and their use; software design and development in the field of management of particle accelerators for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |