USPTO serial 79019821
DIVINOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3365987Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DIVINOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EISLINGEN, DE
DE
EISLINGEN, DE
EISLINGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Walker
Patricia A. Walker Walker & Jocke Co., LPA231 South BroadwayMedina, OH 44256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR USE IN INDUSTRY, NAMELY, ADJUVANTS FOR THE MANUAL AND MECHANICAL CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE OF MOTOR VEHICLES, ADJUVANTS FOR PARTIAL AND PREPARATORY INDUSTRIAL CLEANING, ADJUVANTS FOR WATER TREATMENT, NAMELY, COAGULUM, FLOCKING AGENTS, ANTI-FOAMING AGENTS, WATER CONDITIONERS; UNPROCESSED ARTIFICIAL RESINS FOR INDUSTRY, NAMELY PRODUCTION OF CHEMICALS, PAINTS, GLUES AND POLYMERS; UNPROCESSED PLASTICS; FERTILIZERS; FIRE EXTINGUISHING COMPOSITIONS; TEMPERING AND SOLDERING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, TEMPERING CHEMICALS FOR USE IN METALWORKING OR SOLDERING; CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES FOR PRESERVING FOODSTUFFS; TANNING SUBSTANCES, NAMELY, TANNING AGENTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF LEATHER; ADHESIVES FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | [ PAINTS, VARNISHES, LACQUERS; RUST PRESERVATIVES IN THE NATURE OF A COATING; WOOD PRESERVATIVES, COLORANTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PAINT; MORDANTS FOR USE IN INDUSTRY, NAMELY, FOR PAINTING, PRINTING AND DIPPING; RAW NATURAL RESINS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF RESINS AND FOR GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE; METAL IN FOIL AND POWDER FOR PAINTERS, DECORATORS, PRINTERS AND ARTISTS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | INDUSTRIAL OILS AND GREASES, NAMELY, INDUSTRIAL LUBRICANTS, ALL PURPOSE LUBRICANTS FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY, MACHINES AND APPLIANCES; DUST ABSORBING, WETTING AND BINDING COMPOSITIONS; FUELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZELLER + GMELIN GMBH & Co
- Other trademarks owned by Zeller + Gmelin GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by ZELLER + GMELIN GMBH & Co
- Other trademarks owned by ZELLER + GMELIN GMBH & Co
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named DIVINOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 21, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |