Drawing for MY EYES

USPTO serial 79019839

MY EYES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253897Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY EYES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maureen C. Kassner

MAUREEN C KASSNER AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 22002005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business administration, namely administration consultancy services in the field of freshness and preservation of shelf food and/or consumer products, safety of food, storage and transport of food and consumer products; building and maintaining databases in the field of freshness and preservation of shelf food and the origin of food and/or consumer products; providing business information in the aforementioned field, via a global computer network and an on-line computer databaseSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041educational information, namely information on training programs in the fields of freshness and preservation of shelf food, the origin of food and/or consumer products, safety of food, storage and transport of food and consumer products via a global computer network and an on-line computer databaseSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 12, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 24, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 24, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 2, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 9, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance