USPTO serial 79019884
YEARDISK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YEARDISK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jarmal Richard
YEARDISK INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD16 WATTLE CLOSE, MACKENZIE QLD 4156AUSTRALIAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming for others; Development of computer game software; Design and development of multimedia products; Programming of multimedia applications; Design of computer software and programs for others; Design and creation of web sites for others;Animation and special-effects design for others; Development of virtual reality game software; Programming design, development and implementation of interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software; Database development services; Creation and maintenance of web sites for others; Creation and provision of web pages to and for third parties; Design of image processing software for use in video production and playback; graphic design services; Hosting of interactive digital content on the Internet; Computer services; namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection,editing, organizing, modifying, book marking transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; and Selection, design, and implementation of interactive content computer hardware and software systems for others for mass storage of electronic data, sound, images,and text, comprising but not limited to hard disc drives, flash and RAM memory drives, and optical media data carriers, including compact discs, CD-ROM's, DVDs, DVD-ROM and DVD-RAM discs, and DVD-Video discs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |